i cannot help but think that a large number of people who stumble upon ziggurat.org from search engine referrals must be, ultimately, disappointed in what they find.

excerpted from my webalizer stats for the past few days, since i remembered to fix my access logs the other day to actually report on referrers:

Top 20 of 74 Total Search Strings

  1. (56 hits, 20.66%) sex
  2. (50 hits, 18.45%) doll
  3. (19 hits, 7.01%) ziggurat
  4. (16 hits, 5.90%) ex girlfriend
  5. (15 hits, 5.54%) scared
  6. (7 hits, 2.58%) girlfriend
  7. (6 hits, 2.21%) psycho
  8. (6 hits, 2.21%) sex doll
  9. (4 hits, 1.48%) 1973 mach 1 mustang
  10. (3 hits, 1.11%) Ziggurat
  11. (2 hits, 0.74%) 1973 mach 1
  12. (2 hits, 0.74%) EX%20SEX%20SEX%20SEX
  13. (2 hits, 0.74%) EX-GIRLFRIEND
  14. (2 hits, 0.74%) Matthew%2BShepard
  15. (2 hits, 0.74%) SEX
  16. (2 hits, 0.74%) car emblem
  17. (2 hits, 0.74%) crock pot soap
  18. (2 hits, 0.74%) doll pictures
  19. (2 hits, 0.74%) doll sex
  20. (2 hits, 0.74%) free ex girlfriend pics

all of this really makes me want to ask: is there seriously that much of an audience for free ex girlfriend pics? i mean. it isn’t very descriptive, is it? it seems to me that more specificity is recommended in googling for free porn. at least, if more specific terms were being provided, they wouldn’t end up at what is clearly the most popular thing i have ever posted.

or, hey, maybe they would’ve. this is a universe of infinite possibilities, after all.