the everyday adventures of sabrina

i'm happy, hope you're happy too

it was inevitable

Comments off

tonight i got my first irate phone call from a friend, asking, “how can you not love casablanca?!?!?!

the reason is very simple. i like my romances to end up with happy people at the end.

which is why (well, part of) breakfast at tiffany’s is my favorite classic movie.

you said it

Comments off

via viki:

MMMM PIE

new painting, yay

Comments off

i ordered (as noted previously) a new print — One Rose II, by Heleen Vriesendorp — and, naturally, it was delivered while I was at LISA.

Anyways, I went out to brunch with Sean today, at Orange in printers row, and that was pretty good. I had the pancake flight, which was four different types of silver dollar pancakes — this week’s theme ingredient was pineapple — and after that, we went for a ride in my car, because they’re borrowing it this weekend, and it’s been awhile since Sean’s driven a stick shift.

So that after that, we went upstairs and Sean helped me hang the new print. actually, Sean hung the print, I pretty much just watched. I’m very pleased with it. I like pretty flowers. I like paintings. So I like pretty paintings of pretty flowers as well.

Interestingly, Sean and I both had the same impression of the painting, which shocked the hell out of me when he mentioned it, apropos nothing. for some reason, the painting just reminds me a lot of the Dark Tower books. of course, the rose is integral to the story, but the print’s rose is blue, and in the books the rose is red. But that’s just aesthetics. There’s some sort of sense in the painting, reminiscent of the scenery in the books. Something of the juxtaposition — and can I just say how shocked I am that this dictation software can recognize the word “juxtaposition” but can’t get “red,” and writes “Brad” instead? Sigh. — between the frankly ugly landscape, and the often frankly ugly interactions between characters and locations, and this one perfect rose. To say much more than that, if you have not read the story, would probably spoil things, so I won’t go on. if you have read the story, you’ll know what I’m talking about; if you haven’t read it, then you really really should. Even if you don’t really like Stephen King all that much, it’s not really traditional Stephen King as far as horror goes — it’s mostly just a fantastic story (in terms of fantasy, not a value judgement) that involves everything from romance and guns, post-nuclear apocalyptic civilization, and bizarre family politics to enormously disconcerting locations and imagery, and more. I could keep going on — it is, after all, probably my favorite book series of all time — but I won’t, because again, if you’ve read the book, you know what I’m talking about; and if you haven’t, you should.

anyways, given the obvious differences between the print rose, and the book rose, I’m really surprised that Sean had the same impression that I did — namely that the painting is reminiscent of the book.

That’s really all. I guess this wasn’t a very interesting blog entry.

yay

Comments off

one of the things i did yesterday while i was at the office — got work to agree to cover the cost of meeting space in gleacher for the january chi-sage meeting i’m trying to get together. possibly on an ongoing basis. w00t.

the least successful holiday specials of all time:

Noam Chomsky: Deconstructing Christmas (1998)

This PBS/WGBH special featured linguist and social commentator Chomsky sitting at a desk, explaining how the development of the commercial Christmas season directly relates to the loss of individual freedoms in the United States and the subjugation of indigenous people in southeast Asia. Despite a rave review by Z magazine, musical guest Zach de la Rocha and the concession of Chomsky to wear a seasonal hat for a younger demographic appeal, this is known to be the least requested Christmas special ever made.